nanog mailing list archives

Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:53:51 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2/4/2014 10:47 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:09:02 -0800, Paul Ferguson said:

I'd like to echo Jared's sentiment here -- collectively
speaking, service providers need to figure out a way to deal with
this issue, before some congresscritters start to try to
introduce legislation that will force you to to do it in a way
that no one will like.

Can somebody explain to me why those who run eyeball networks are
able to block outbound packets when the customer hasn't paid their
bill, but can't seem to block packets that shouldn't be coming from
that cablemodem?

(And yes, I know that in the first case, it urges the customer to
cough up the bucks, and in the second case, it's usually not a
revenue generator)


It's a dichotomy that is... unexplainable for me personally.

- - ferg



- -- 
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlLxNz8ACgkQKJasdVTchbJq6AEApzaaZ9PpPX30kUYAxsGZFzeV
WR98y6VBxlocQE2oQFkBANSa4m0/JOGv+PDQovI4xSkjaE/Ru0V8woagAs1hS1C0
=KAL8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: