Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement

[Andrew Gallo <akg1330 () gmail com>]

Am I correct in thinking that the SIDR work going on in the IETF takes the
registries out of the real-time processing of route
authentication/attestation?

Is RPKI a stop-gap while we wait for full path validation?  Should we be
focusing our energies in that area?

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Sandra Murphy <sandy () tislabs com> wrote:

> On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:39 PM, John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
> wrote:
> >
>
>
> > Note that the claims that could ensue from an operator failing to follow
> best practices
> > and then third-parties suffering an major operational outage is likely
> to be large
>
>
> > Undertaking that risk to the other services that everyone else presently
> rely upon
> > (Whois, reverse DNS) is not reasonable
>
> Which begs the question for me -- ARIN already operates services that
> operators rely upon.  Why are they different?  Does ARIN run no risk of
> litigation due to some perceived involvement of those services in someone's
> operational outage?
>
> Has there been litigation against ARIN tied to, for example, reverse DNS?
> Or the IRR?
>
> --Sandy