nanog mailing list archives
Re: Charter ARP Leak
From: Brett Frankenberger <rbf () rbfnet com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:35:42 -0600
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:27:04PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Valdis, you are correct. What your seeing is caused by multiple IP blocks being assigned to the same CMTS interface.Am I incorrect, though, in believing that ARP packets should only be visible within a broadcast domain,
broadcast domain != subnet
and that because of that, they should not be being passed through a cablemodem attached to such a CMTS interface unless they're within the IP network in which that interface lives (which is probably not 0/0)? This sounds like a firmware bug in either the CMTS or the cablemodem.
int ethernet 0/0 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.0.0 ip address 11.0.0.1 255.255.0.0 secondary ip address 12.0.0.1 255.255.0.0 secondary The broadcast domain will have ARP broadcasts for all three subnets. Doing it over a CMTS doesn't change that. -- Brett
Current thread:
- Charter ARP Leak Stephen R. Carter (Dec 28)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Rampley Jr, Jim F (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Jay Ashworth (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Brett Frankenberger (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Jay Ashworth (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak David Coulson (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Jay Ashworth (Dec 29)
- RE: Charter ARP Leak Corey Touchet (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Ricky Beam (Dec 29)
- RE: Charter ARP Leak Phil Bedard (Dec 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Larry Sheldon (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Rampley Jr, Jim F (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Chris Boyd (Dec 29)
- RE: Charter ARP Leak Phil Bedard (Dec 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Charter ARP Leak Larry Sheldon (Dec 29)