nanog mailing list archives
Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:37:47 -0300
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Justin M. Streiner < streiner () cluebyfour org> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote: No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier today, it sounds like IPv6 support is no longer a separate charge from Akamai. Perhaps that hasn't filtered out to the salescritters yet.
Or they did get the memo, but realised that no sale == no commission. Rubens
Current thread:
- Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Clayton Zekelman (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Brent Jones (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Alejandro Acosta (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Matthew Kaufman (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mark Andrews (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Justin M. Streiner (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Rubens Kuhl (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Justin M. Streiner (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Eric C. Miller (Aug 19)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 19)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)