nanog mailing list archives
Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:03:09 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4 is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier today, it sounds like IPv6 support is no longer a separate charge from Akamai. Perhaps that hasn't filtered out to the salescritters yet.
jms
Current thread:
- Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Clayton Zekelman (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Brent Jones (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Alejandro Acosta (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Matthew Kaufman (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mark Andrews (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Justin M. Streiner (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Rubens Kuhl (Aug 18)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Justin M. Streiner (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Mehmet Akcin (Aug 18)
- RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Eric C. Miller (Aug 19)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 19)
- Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support? Aaron Hopkins (Aug 18)