nanog mailing list archives
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:04:54 -0400
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
My point was that Randy's BGP RIB pruning knobs are missing for a different reason than your router FIB pruning knobs. Neither the science nor the technology exists to create Randy's BGP pruning knobs.ahhh, you dug out the [j]tac tickets, or are you just conjecturbating?
Neither. I'm reporting the state of the science having been engrossed in its research for the better part of a decade. Places like the IRTF RRG. Because no science, also no tech. If you think have some magic new algorithm that the RRG didn't consider, feel free to explain it and I'll demonstrate a scenario for you where it fails too. And I tip my hat to the router vendors for declining to implement knobs which would damage the network, despite the demands of Randy Bush. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
Current thread:
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today, (continued)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Geoff Huston (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Merike Kaeo (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Måns Nilsson (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Måns Nilsson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Brett Frankenberger (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today manning bill (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Steve Noble (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Owen DeLong (Aug 14)