nanog mailing list archives

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post


From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:47:01 -0500

On 4/25/2014 8:23 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 00:57 , Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
wrote:

I just posted a completely empty message for which I apologize.

Larry is confused. He can claim he is not, but posting to NANOG
does not change the facts. Then again, just because I posted to
NANOG doesn't prove I'm right either. Worst of all, this thread
is pretty non-operational now.

In a private message I asked if he could name a single monopoly
that existed without regulation to protect its monopoly power.

I answered in a private message: Microsoft.

Kinda obvious if you think about it for, oh, say, 12 microseconds.

"OK, so you are a troll.

Microsoft is among the most heavily protected-by-regulation companies I
can think of.

Have you ever seen their patent collection?  Can you guess at the size
of their infringement-enforcement staff?  Do you have any idea how many
court-room hours are spent each day protecting their monopoly?"

--
Requiescas in pace o email           Two identifying characteristics
                                        of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio      Infallibility, and the ability to
                                        learn from their mistakes.
                                          (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)


Current thread: