nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGPMON Alert Questions
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 07:15:25 +0200
On Friday, April 04, 2014 05:06:22 AM Sharon Goldberg wrote:
We also looked at prefix filtering and found that it has better partial deployment characteristics. Our analysis assumed that ISPs only filter routes from their *stub* customers. (We defined a stub an AS that does not have its own customers.)
Just curious; in your considerations, how would/did you treat cases where ISP's filter their downstreams, to include their downstream's downstreams? Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions, (continued)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Christopher Morrow (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Christopher Morrow (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Tony Tauber (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Christopher Morrow (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Message not available
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Sharon Goldberg (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Sharon Goldberg (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Nick Hilliard (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Sharon Goldberg (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 05)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Sharon Goldberg (Apr 06)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 06)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Benno Overeinder (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 05)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Anthony Williams (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)