nanog mailing list archives
Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size)
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:36:49 -0400
On Sep 26, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
y'know, it's funny. there is a market in ipv4 space. there is no market in routing table slots. perhaps this is not conspiracy but rather the market is speaking.
That easily could be the case. So how well is has the current model been working out for IPv4? It appears that only feedback mechanism is the "The Cidr Report" <http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Gains>, and last time this topic came up was almost exactly two years ago back at 375000 routes... is this success? Perhaps more conference banners are needed?
of course, we can use the idea of a market in routing table slots, rack space, or coffee to distract from the artificial problems in the only actual market, ipv4 address space.
No desire at all to distract from the discussions on that topic, and in fact, I'd encourage folks (including yourself) to pop on over to PPML and make suggestions for policy changes as desired. That's not an option available to me, and I was simply commenting on the fact that we're recreating the same IPv6 routing table feedback system which gave us our present "success" with the IPv4 routing table. FYI, /John
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 30)
- Fwd: minimum IPv6 announcement size Alexander Neilson (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Lustgraaf, Paul J [ITNET] (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 27)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Scott Brim (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Steven Bellovin (Sep 28)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Blake Dunlap (Sep 28)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 30)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Steve Bertrand (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nurul Islam (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)