nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:41:25 -1000
sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...The foundation of that, though, was ignorance of address space exhaustion.
no. ipv4 was the second time, not the first randy
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Brandon Ross (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Joe Abley (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Matt Palmer (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size TJ (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 30)
- Fwd: minimum IPv6 announcement size Alexander Neilson (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Lustgraaf, Paul J [ITNET] (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 26)