nanog mailing list archives

Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric Internet


From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:04:54 -0500

LOL, we'll move the taps one layer down ...

-J


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org> wrote:

----- Forwarded message from Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> -----

Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
To: liberationtech <liberationtech () lists stanford edu>
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric
Internet
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Reply-To: liberationtech <liberationtech () lists stanford edu>


On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:28 AM, David Johnson <David.Johnson () aljazeera net>
wrote:

Interesting ... but is this even possible?

http://world.time.com/2013/09/18/brazil-looks-to-break-from-u-s-centric-internet/

Well, there are a bunch of different concepts being discussed.  The
primary one is localization of routing, which isn't just possible, it's
best-practice, and something Brazil has been doing an excellent job of
already for quite a few years.  If you look at
https://pch.net/applications/ixpdir/summary/ you'll see that they've got
23 active exchanges, which puts them second in the world after the U.S.,
with 77% annualized growth, compared to 10% in the U.S.  If you look at the
Brazil section of https://pch.net/ixpdir you'll see that almost all of
that growth has been occurring since they made it an explicit policy goal
in 2008, and began aggressively implementing IXP best-practices.

At a governance level, Brazil is divided.  The CGI, which decides and
implements domestic Internet policy, is the agency responsible for all this
growth and best-practices-following.  As such, they've been largely aligned
with OECD-country and Internet interests.  The Brazilian federal
government, on the other hand, sets foreign policy, interacts with the ITU,
et cetera.  And so although it has no appreciable influence over what
happens _within_ the country, it's what's seen by other national
governments in diplomatic circles.  In Internet governance, Brazil tends
toward this Brazil-India-South Africa axis, which doesn't particularly
align with the Internet or OECD countries, unless by accident.  This is the
area that Internet folks are most worried about, since those three
countries are second-tier thought-leaders in the ITU, and can swing a lot
of developing-country votes in their respective regions.  So Brazil is, in
many ways, the U.S.' opposite: they do the right thing domestically, but
say the wrong thing internationally.

                                -Bill






--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
of list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
companys () stanford edu.


----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org
AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B  47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5



Current thread: