nanog mailing list archives

Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric Internet


From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:37:06 +0200

----- Forwarded message from Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> -----

Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
To: liberationtech <liberationtech () lists stanford edu>
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric Internet
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Reply-To: liberationtech <liberationtech () lists stanford edu>


On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:28 AM, David Johnson <David.Johnson () aljazeera net> wrote:

Interesting ... but is this even possible?
http://world.time.com/2013/09/18/brazil-looks-to-break-from-u-s-centric-internet/

Well, there are a bunch of different concepts being discussed.  The primary one is localization of routing, which isn't 
just possible, it's best-practice, and something Brazil has been doing an excellent job of already for quite a few 
years.  If you look at https://pch.net/applications/ixpdir/summary/ you'll see that they've got 23 active exchanges, 
which puts them second in the world after the U.S., with 77% annualized growth, compared to 10% in the U.S.  If you 
look at the Brazil section of https://pch.net/ixpdir you'll see that almost all of that growth has been occurring since 
they made it an explicit policy goal in 2008, and began aggressively implementing IXP best-practices.

At a governance level, Brazil is divided.  The CGI, which decides and implements domestic Internet policy, is the 
agency responsible for all this growth and best-practices-following.  As such, they've been largely aligned with 
OECD-country and Internet interests.  The Brazilian federal government, on the other hand, sets foreign policy, 
interacts with the ITU, et cetera.  And so although it has no appreciable influence over what happens _within_ the 
country, it's what's seen by other national governments in diplomatic circles.  In Internet governance, Brazil tends 
toward this Brazil-India-South Africa axis, which doesn't particularly align with the Internet or OECD countries, 
unless by accident.  This is the area that Internet folks are most worried about, since those three countries are 
second-tier thought-leaders in the ITU, and can swing a lot of developing-country votes in their respective regions.  
So Brazil is, in many ways, the U.S.' opposite: they do the right thing domestically, but say the wrong thing 
internationally. 

                                -Bill






-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by 
emailing moderator at companys () stanford edu.


----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org
AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B  47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Current thread: