nanog mailing list archives

RE: Network configuration archiving


From: Nolan Rollo <nrollo () kw-corp com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 03:56:30 +0000

Puppet, Chef, cfEngine, etc... the list goes on and on, it's a matter of taste (no chef pun intended) and what you're 
familiar with as well as what works for your device configurations and the management team

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth McRae [mailto:kenneth.mcrae () dreamhost com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 11:45 PM
To: Jimmy Hess
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Network configuration archiving

Hiw about SolarWinds Config Mgmt software?
On Oct 24, 2013 8:38 PM, "Jimmy Hess" <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Job Snijders < 
job.snijders () hibernianetworks com> wrote:

Dear all,
I am unsure what we as networkers have done in the past, but I am 
sure we've done our fair share of atonement and don't have to keep 
using RANCID.


Does the nature of the codebase and future development matter all that
much?    Not to dismiss it as a factor,   but I think other criteria should
be more important  :)

Nrmally  when I would want to compare software ----   I would be concerned
first and foremost,     (1)  What does it do/what makes it unique --  is
something special about  package X  over package Y?;
(2)   Does it meet all the  minimum needs I have right now to be a viable
solution?
           Does it grab all my configs and  put them in a permanent 
revision control system?  :)

(3) How reliable is it,  can I trust it?   Is it very secure and safe to
use?    It's no good if it breaks, fails,  or does something dangerous.
How much care and feeding will it need to keep working?          If it
needs complex repair work every few weeks,  I don't like it.

(4) How easy is it to get up and running,  and to perform any required 
ongoing maintenance
(5) What extra nice to have functionality does it have?


(6)  Maybe other stuff like  what language its written in,  if extra 
features need to be added

--
-JH



Current thread: