nanog mailing list archives

Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and AS57954 (in ukraine)


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 14:51:30 -0400

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Warren Bailey
<wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com> wrote:

Abuse is abuse.. People are going to do bad things, even when you call them illegal (in some cases, as a result of 
calling them illegal). It's not illegal to be a tool, but it is illegal to break a law. In my opinikn Laws need to be 
written and passed, not thought about and argued over. If we are going to arbitrarily make our own laws, why don't we 
start at something cooler than preventing a guy announcing someone's Internet addresses? I understand the magnitude 
of these actions, but at some point we need to pay attention  to things outside of /dev/internet. Again.. I'm not 
saying these hijackers aren't pricks, I'm saying that stealing an AS number shouldn't be illegal - committing a crime 
with information gained should be (and is). It's not that I don't care, I just don't care that MUCH.


agreed, I wasn't of the opinion that the action was 'right', just that
calling it 'illegal' was quite a leap. I do think that putting effort
into making it significantly harder to 'hijack prefixes' is a good
thing, which is the reason I put effort into: tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr

pitching a fit from the sidelines isn't helpful, finding a way to keep
it from happening again/again/again at least tries to move the ball
forward.

-chris


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device



-------- Original message --------
From: goemon () anime net
Date: 05/06/2013 11:31 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>
Cc: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>,Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>,NANOG <nanog () 
nanog org>
Subject: Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and AS57954 (in ukraine)


if anyone wondered why abuse goes unchecked, wonder no longer.

-Dan

On Mon, 6 May 2013, Warren Bailey wrote:

+1


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device



-------- Original message --------
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: 05/06/2013 9:29 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>
Cc: Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>,Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>,Nick 
Hilliard <nick () foobar org>,NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and AS57954 (in ukraine)





On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu<mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>> wrote:
On Mon, 06 May 2013 15:27:35 -0000, Warren Bailey said:
Illegal or undesired?

This sort of stuff comes in two flavors: "typo" and "intentionally done
in furtherance of criminal activities".

The fact that an AS number and matching IP range are involved tends to say it's
not a typo.


maybe warren's question is better stated: "Please point to relevant legal code in the jurisdiction(s) which are 
relevant." (if you feel this is 'illegal', showing where in the relevant code(s) where this would be classified as 
such would help)

-chris






Current thread: