nanog mailing list archives
RE: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:20:07 +0100
If you are doing strict BGP prefix-filter, it's either very easy to
generate ACL while at it Yes and that is exactly what needs to become a habit for all the operators. We all do care what our neighbors advertise to us or what prefixes we accept from them. But only a few really do care whether that's actually what is leaving our neighbor's network. It's a pity that rpf is not "on" by default for interfaces over which the ebgp session is configured. adam
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty John Curran (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Mark Andrews (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty John Curran (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Saku Ytti (Mar 27)
- RE: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Adam Vitkovsky (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 28)
- RE: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Adam Vitkovsky (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Chris Adams (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 28)
- RE: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Adam Vitkovsky (Mar 29)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 29)