nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:45:31 -0400
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:51:35 -0500, Jack Bates said:
They are not, and I can think of quite a few people who would stare blankly at you for making such a statement. Of course, I can think of plenty of people who we'd like to see implementing BCP38 concepts that would need you to define ingress and egress.
Of course, the fact they don't understand ingress and egress are *totally* unrelated to the fact they can't figure out how to deploy BCP38, correct?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Paul Ferguson (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Mark Andrews (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Mark Andrews (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 27)