nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Resolver Problems
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:41:59 +0000
Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net> wrote:
Tracking the clients would be a huge dataset and be especially complicated in clusters.
The memory usage is guite manageable: for the BIND patch it is at most 40-80 bytes (for 32 or 64 bit machines) per request per second. You're doing well if you need a megabyte. There's no need to get complicated with clusters: it's enough of an improvement just to track rates per server. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first.
Current thread:
- Re: Open Resolver Problems, (continued)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Tony Finch (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems William Herrin (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mark Andrews (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Tony Finch (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Tony Finch (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Joe Abley (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Tony Finch (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Marco Davids (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jared Mauch (Mar 27)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Joe Abley (Mar 27)
- Can we not just fix it? WAS:Re: Open Resolver Problems Michael DeMan (Mar 28)
- Re: Can we not just fix it? WAS:Re: Open Resolver Problems David Conrad (Mar 28)
- Re: Can we not just fix it? WAS:Re: Open Resolver Problems Saku Ytti (Mar 28)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Ben Aitchison (Mar 28)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jimmy Hess (Mar 29)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mark Andrews (Mar 29)