nanog mailing list archives
Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
From: Patrick <nanog () haller ws>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:16:24 +0800
On 2013-03-15 12:33, . wrote:
Similary, maybe you need exploitability to have a internet.
Exploitability = usability from a different perspective. Postel said "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept", which seems like usability restated, and would QED this. Granted, we think we've made something fairly usable: it's always someone else's filter fail or multi-hour/day DDoS that ends up in the news... until we get unlucky. ;)
Current thread:
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work, (continued)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To: Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jimmy Hess (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work David Walker (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 19)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)