nanog mailing list archives
Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
From: Patrick <nanog () haller ws>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:05:31 +0800
On 2013-03-14 13:56, Jay Ashworth wrote:
http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/03/security-when-the-bad-guys-have-technology-too-how-do-we-survive/ Three words: "desktop gene sequencing", "ebola", "script kiddies".
When the costs of offense fall, a pretty good response is to drive the costs of defense through the floor. E.g. how do we drive the costs of mitigating DDoSs down further? A second best response would be ubiquitous surveillance....
Current thread:
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To: Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jimmy Hess (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work David Walker (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 19)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)