Re: What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?

["Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon () gmail com>]

On Thursday, March 7, 2013, Antonio Querubin wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
>
>  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Antonio Querubin <tony () lavanauts org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >  I don't think the business case is the issue.  It is the timeline over
> > > which the sense of urgency becomes important enough for most execs to
> > > take
> > > seriously.  That's still a large unknown.
> >
> >
> > Why should they care about the timeline if they aren't convinced it is
> > even
> > worth doing?
>
> If they're convinced that it's not worth doing ever - then you're wasting
> your own time.  They may think it's not worth a lot of effort over the
> immediate future but if the effort is spread thinly and integrated into
> regular infrastructure upgrades over a longer period of time then that's an
> easier pill to swallow.


You are talking about people who have already decided its worth doing and
so they need convincing as to how early to start. I am thinking of people
who need convincing in the first place. For such people, business case is
their language, timeline comes after they are convinced


> Antonio Querubin
> e-mail:  tony () lavanauts org
> xmpp:  antonioquerubin () gmail com


-- 

Mukom Akong T.

http://about.me/perfexcellence |  twitter: @perfexcellent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the
hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------