nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google's QUIC
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:28:39 -0700
On 6/28/13 2:15 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
SCTP is used successfully for the purpose for which it was intended, which is connecting SS7 switches over IP. It's not as much a posterchild for an application agnostic transport as some people would like to think.On 06/28/2013 02:07 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:----- Original Message -----Simple Computer Telephony Protocol? Did anyone ever actually implement that?From: "Michael Thomas" <mike () mtcc com> My first reaction to this was why not SCTP, but apparently they thinkNo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream_Control_Transmission_Protocol
*Mike*
Current thread:
- Re: Google's QUIC, (continued)
- Re: Google's QUIC Saku Ytti (Jun 30)
- Re: Google's QUIC Jim Popovitch (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Octavio Alvarez (Jun 29)
- Re: Google's QUIC Leo Bicknell (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC cb.list6 (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Phil Fagan (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Phil Fagan (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Michael Thomas (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC joel jaeggli (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Nikolay Shopik (Jun 28)
- Re: Google's QUIC Michael Thomas (Jun 28)