Re: Google's QUIC

[Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com>]

I took that as path agnostic.


On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com> wrote:
> > "In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has
> the
> > potential to allow the different data flows, coming and going to a
> client,
> > to be served on a single server." - Google
> >
> > I'll drink the juice
>
> i don't think much juice is required... doesn't that just say that the
> same 'flow' will follow the same path through the network? and that
> most/all (save a10/yahoo!) loadbalancers just LB based on 5-tuple (at
> best)? so keeping things in a single flow/stream/5-tuple will drop
> packets from one host deterministicaly on a single other host at the
> far side?



-- 
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618