nanog mailing list archives
Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue
From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 13:19:44 -0300
Botnets to help with peering ratio's could be a new business model? :) On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Neil Harris <neil () tonal clara co uk> wrote:On 22/06/13 13:08, Matthew Petach wrote:That's easily solved by padding the ACK to 1500 bytes as well. MattOr indeed by the media player sending large amounts of traffic back totheCDN via auxiliary HTTP POST requests?ah... botnet... how I love thee?
Current thread:
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue, (continued)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Benson Schliesser (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Bill Woodcock (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Niels Bakker (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Matthew Petach (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Neil Harris (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Neil Harris (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Matthew Petach (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Christopher Morrow (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue jim deleskie (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Niels Bakker (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Joe Provo (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Bill Woodcock (Jun 21)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Benson Schliesser (Jun 21)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 21)