nanog mailing list archives
Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:19:38 -0400
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Niels Bakker wrote: [snip]
Also, if you don't have data, best to keep your opinion to yourself, because you might well be wrong.
The deuce you say! Replacing uninformed conjecture and conspiracy theories with actual data? Next thing you know there will be actual engineering discussions instead ... -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE / NANOG
Current thread:
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue, (continued)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Matthew Petach (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Neil Harris (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Neil Harris (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Matthew Petach (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Christopher Morrow (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue jim deleskie (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Niels Bakker (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Joe Provo (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Bill Woodcock (Jun 21)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Benson Schliesser (Jun 21)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Owen DeLong (Jun 21)