nanog mailing list archives
Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue
From: "Robert M. Enger" <NANOG () enger us>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:47:54 -0700
Perhaps last-mile operators should A) advertise each of their metropolitan regional systems as a separate AS B) establish an interconnection point in each region where they will accept traffic destined for their in-region customers without charging any fee This leaves the operational model of WAN backbone transit networks unchanged: fights about traffic balance and settlement fees can continue in perpetuity. Those big sources who fall afoul of balance can opt to deliver traffic directly to the last-mile network(s) in given markets. Transfers WAN networking cost-burden to the content originator (through their agents: CDN operators or transit providers) Reduces financial burden on last-mile operator (demand is reduced on their company operated backbone and/or transit capacity that they purchase) RESULTS Customers get to receive content they are requesting: technical and political impediments are removed. Last-mile operator only has to improve in-region network facilities: to deliver the data that their own customers have requested
Current thread:
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue, (continued)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Wayne E Bouchard (Jun 19)
- RE: net neutrality and peering wars continue Siegel, David (Jun 19)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Benson Schliesser (Jun 19)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Leo Bicknell (Jun 19)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Benson Schliesser (Jun 19)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Siegel, David (Jun 19)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Jerry Dent (Jun 19)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Benson Schliesser (Jun 20)
- RE: net neutrality and peering wars continue Siegel, David (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Robert M. Enger (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Leo Bicknell (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Blake Dunlap (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Aaron C. de Bruyn (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Jared Mauch (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Jeff Kell (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Jon Lewis (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue William Herrin (Jun 22)
- Message not available
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Randy Bush (Jun 22)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Bill Woodcock (Jun 20)
- Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue Martin Barry (Jun 20)