nanog mailing list archives

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:17:53 -0500 (EST)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Francois Mezei" <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>

Is last mile infrastructure really considered "internet" ? If a GPON
system operates as layer 2, it provides no internet connectivity, no IP
routing and would/should not implement any IP use policies such as
throttling etc. About the only traffic management it would do is
provide separate garanteed bandwidth channel for VoIP. (or via QoS)


If the last mile is sold only as wholesale (as is the case for
Australian NBN), then it is up to each private service provider who
buys access to reach homes to implement IP policies and connect to the
internet, provide services such as DHCP etc.

Though I wouldn't pick GPON over home-run, yes, that's roughly the point I
and another poster were trying to make in earlier replies: 

If you're at layer 1, and arguably at layer 2, then move-add-change on 
physical patches / VLAN assignments is all you would need to log, since you
don't actually touch "real traffic".

One of the major arguments in favor of doing it that way.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: