nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:40:10 -0500
I'd like to join Jay, Scott, Leo, and presumably Dave supporting muni network ownership -- or at least a not-for-profit entity. I tried to start one a decade ago, but a lawsuit was threatened by the incumbent cable provider (MediaOne in those days) who claimed an exclusive right. Since then the state law has been changed, so we really ought to look into it again here. Although the 4th Amendment originally applied to only the Federal Government (states routinely violated it), the 14th Amendment applies it to the state (and local) governments now.
Current thread:
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth, (continued)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Owen DeLong (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Owen DeLong (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 30)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 30)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth William Allen Simpson (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Masatoshi Enomoto (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Zachary Giles (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Leo Bicknell (Jan 29)