nanog mailing list archives
Re: ddos attacks
From: Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:13:48 -0500
On 12/18/13 8:03 PM, "Jon Lewis" <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800, "cb.list6" said:I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4 UDP. It is the simplest solution that is proactive.What are the prospects for ipv6 UDP not suffering the same fate?Roughly 0%, but there's so little v6 traffic compared to v4, you probably don't have to worry about v6 attack traffic yet...particularly if you're not dual stack yet. :)
-1 uninsightful Can't find any public data showing IPv6 as a percent of total bits, but it's certainly a meaningful percent of hits in many countries and networks. See also http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets- 00 which describes risks from IPv6 to people who think they are running an IPv4-only network. Lee
Current thread:
- Re: ddos attacks, (continued)
- Re: ddos attacks Tore Anderson (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Eugeniu Patrascu (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Adrian M (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Paul Ferguson (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Tore Anderson (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Lee Howard (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Jon Lewis (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks cb.list6 (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks cb.list6 (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 20)