nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:45:21 +0000
Wait, ISPs rolling out native dual stack are "victimizing" their customers? ________________________________________ From: Owen DeLong [owen () delong com] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 4:41 AM To: Leo Vegoda Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Agreed… Unforutnately, the big guys (Comcast, AT&T) in America seem to like victimizing their customers with undersized assignments, limiting choice of proper prefix sizes to only their business class customers. I’m not sure why they are doing this. I know when I’ve had conversations with them, they haven’t exactly given a reason so much as just said that they thought a /48 was ridiculous. Of course, if AT&T is blocking protocol 41, that’s even worse, because at least so long as that isn’t blocked, you can still get an HE tunnel and get a /48 if you need it anyway. Owen
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Leo Vegoda (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Livingood, Jason (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Rob Seastrom (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Ricky Beam (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Ricky Beam (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Ricky Beam (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Ricky Beam (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Owen DeLong (Dec 02)