nanog mailing list archives
Re: turning on comcast v6
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:22:11 +0000
On 11/12/2013 15:11, Eric Oosting wrote:
just to get IPv6 to work correctly. Yea, that's TOTALLY reasonable.
Sounds a bit like configuring access layer ipv4 in the early 1990s. It took years of early production pain to turn it into a commodity product. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: turning on comcast v6, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Cutler James R (Dec 09)
- Message not available
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Cutler James R (Dec 09)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 09)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Cutler James R (Dec 09)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Jared Mauch (Dec 09)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Cutler James R (Dec 09)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 09)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Livingood, Jason (Dec 10)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Eric Oosting (Dec 11)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Nick Hilliard (Dec 11)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Andrew D Kirch (Dec 11)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Randy Bush (Dec 11)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Eric Oosting (Dec 11)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Randy Bush (Dec 11)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 joel jaeggli (Dec 11)