nanog mailing list archives
Re: subrate SFP?
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:26:55 +0300
On (2013-08-30 11:30 -0400), Tim Durack wrote:
It would be interesting to have some other smart SFP options too, like macsec for example...
Or HQoS in a SFP, for that one port which kills your ability to get away with cheap L3-switch style box :) But tbh the moment you'll need control-plane in the SFP, it becomes complicated for me to deploy, as then I need to figure out configuration backups, provisioning support etc. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- RE: subrate SFP?, (continued)
- RE: subrate SFP? Jamie Bowden (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? Jimmy Hess (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Charles N Wyble (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Joel Jaeggli (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Nick B (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Jima (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Saku Ytti (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? sthaug (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? Tim Durack (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? Saku Ytti (Aug 30)