nanog mailing list archives

Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers


From: Michael Smith <mksmith () mac com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:48:20 -0700

You should also consider who exactly your customers (or you alone) want to reach.  Are you mostly looking to connect to 
eyeball networks?  Enterprise networks?  Government networks?   If you have some target networks you should do some due 
diligence to find out how well connected your various options are to the networks that mean the most to you.

If possible, I would also recommend talking to other people that are in your data centers, if that's possible.  You 
might find out about hidden vendor-specific gremlins in that location.

Regards,

Mike


On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eric Louie <elouie () yahoo com> wrote:

Based on various conversation threads on Nanog I've come up with a few
criteria for evaluating Tier 1 providers.  I'm open to add other criteria -
what would you add to this list?  And how would I get a quantitative or
qualitative measure of it?



routing stability

BGP community offerings

congestion issues

BGP Peering relationships

path diversity

IPv6 table size



Seems like everyone offers 5 9's service, 45 ms coast-to-coast, 24x7
customer support, 100/1Gbps/10Gbps with various DIR/CIR and burst rates.
I'm shopping for new service and want to do better than choosing on
reputation.  (or, is reputation also a criteria?)



much appreciated,

Eric Louie






Current thread: