nanog mailing list archives

Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers


From: Bill Blackford <bblackford () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:20:11 -0700

If this was previously mentioned, my apologies.

The time they can respond to a PNI upgrade. If you have an existing 10G and
wish to add another. Can this be provisioned off the same device to form a
LAG or can they only provide ECMP. May not be something you can evaluate at
contract signing, but it can quickly become an issue when you need it.




On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Eric Louie <elouie () yahoo com> wrote:

Based on various conversation threads on Nanog I've come up with a few
criteria for evaluating Tier 1 providers.  I'm open to add other criteria -
what would you add to this list?  And how would I get a quantitative or
qualitative measure of it?



routing stability

BGP community offerings

congestion issues

BGP Peering relationships

path diversity

IPv6 table size



Seems like everyone offers 5 9's service, 45 ms coast-to-coast, 24x7
customer support, 100/1Gbps/10Gbps with various DIR/CIR and burst rates.
I'm shopping for new service and want to do better than choosing on
reputation.  (or, is reputation also a criteria?)



much appreciated,

Eric Louie






-- 
Bill Blackford

Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....


Current thread: