nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?
From: Thomas Schmid <schmid () dfn de>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:32:15 +0200
Am 30.04.2013 17:53, schrieb Patrick W. Gilmore:
"Core"? Seriously? Which of these statements are true: A) Is it impossible for an end user or business (i.e. non-ISP) to get a direct connection to a "Tier 1" (whatever the hell that means) provider. B) Most traffic on the Internet traverses Tier 1s today. C) A Tier 1 has a different profit motive than a Tier 2 (whatever the hell that means) providers. D) All Tier 1 providers are larger than all Tier 2 providers. We'll just skip over the E) all of the above.
agree - I oversimplified, but I think you got the idea ... Thomas
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
Current thread:
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?, (continued)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Chris Boyd (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Darius Jahandarie (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Chris Boyd (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Dobbins, Roland (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? joel jaeggli (Apr 30)