nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz () forthnetgroup gr>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:22:14 +0300
I think blocking phishing sites vs blocking ddos require a different approach. -- Tassos Jared Mauch wrote on 30/04/2013 18:11:
Sounds like a no win situation. Either you let the bad guys do things or get complaints you blocked the bad guys. Jared Mauch On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com> wrote:On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits (Disregarding a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network) 2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in one direction) to the bad actors traffic.3 - Deliver all packets unless I've signed up for an enhanced security offering? --Chris
Current thread:
- Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? ML (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Chris Boyd (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Darius Jahandarie (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Chris Boyd (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? ML (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Dobbins, Roland (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)