nanog mailing list archives
Re: route for linx.net in Level3?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 05:43:44 +0900
Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of everyone connected to it,
yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does this, but i think all my competitors should.
I have experience of several networks where that is not the case. IGP carries routes for loopback and internal-facing interfaces;
i have seen some carry external because, for some reason, they do not want to re-write next-hop at the border. randy
Current thread:
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3?, (continued)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Yang Yu (Apr 03)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Jay Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Leo Bicknell (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Tom Paseka (Apr 04)
- RE: route for linx.net in Level3? Adam Vitkovsky (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Paul Ferguson (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Jay Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Yang Yu (Apr 03)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? John Kemp (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Joe Abley (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Tom Paseka (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Leo Bicknell (Apr 04)
- RE: route for linx.net in Level3? Adam Vitkovsky (Apr 05)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Leo Bicknell (Apr 05)