nanog mailing list archives
Re: route for linx.net in Level3?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:10:45 -0400
On 2013-04-04, at 15:53, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson () gmail com> wrote:
Leo Bicknell wrote: Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of everyone connected to it,
I have experience of several networks where that is not the case. IGP carries routes for loopback and internal-facing interfaces; external-facing interface routes are only known to the local router; pervasive next-hop-self for IBGP. So, no great survey, but don't assume that everybody does things the same way. Joe
Current thread:
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3?, (continued)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Job Snijders (Apr 03)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Yang Yu (Apr 03)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Jay Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Leo Bicknell (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Tom Paseka (Apr 04)
- RE: route for linx.net in Level3? Adam Vitkovsky (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Paul Ferguson (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Jay Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? John Kemp (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Joe Abley (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Tom Paseka (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Leo Bicknell (Apr 04)
- RE: route for linx.net in Level3? Adam Vitkovsky (Apr 05)
- Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Leo Bicknell (Apr 05)