nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big Temporary Networks
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:26:05 +0100
On 14/09/2012 12:38, Paul Thornton wrote:
Veering slightly off-topic for NANOG, but is this worth taking onto the address policy mailing list ahead of RIPE65 to ensure people who aren't in the WG session are aware of the issue - and can therefore support (or question) any proposed changes?
I just posted to ap-wg about this:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-September/007183.html
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Big Temporary Networks, (continued)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nat Morris (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nat Morris (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Tore Anderson (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Paul Thornton (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Måns Nilsson (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jimmy Hess (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Måns Nilsson (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Sean Lazar (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Tim Franklin (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jeroen Massar (Sep 13)