nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:02:11 -0400
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Eric Tykwinski <eric-list () truenet com> wrote:
I agree, and just use the Threshold plugin so when it drops below or goes above a certain # to notify you. http://docs.cacti.net/plugin:thold
is a threshold helpful here? (well, it's helpful to a point at least) what if your neighbour starts deaggragating (or sending you their internal deaggragates) in place of 50k real routes? no alarm, no 'change' from a numbers perspective, but certainly a traffic shift and reach-ability change :( Isn't a speed-of-change threshold also interesting here?
Current thread:
- Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? ML (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Saku Ytti (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Jay Ashworth (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Joseph Jackson (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Eric Tykwinski (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Christopher Morrow (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Justin M. Streiner (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Eric Tykwinski (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Joseph Jackson (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? William F. Maton Sotomayor (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Andrew Gallo (Oct 03)