nanog mailing list archives
Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring?
From: ML <ml () kenweb org>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:43:09 -0400
Has anyone put in place a method to identify if one their BGP peers suddenly withdraws X% of their prefixes?
e.g I should expect ~420k prefixes in a "complete"[1] routing table from a transit peer today. If suddenly I'm only getting 390k prefixes I'd guess a major network was depeered or similiar.
If so how are people doing this? SNMP MIB, screen scrape? [1] Varying levels of completeless apply.
Current thread:
- Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? ML (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Saku Ytti (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Jay Ashworth (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Joseph Jackson (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Eric Tykwinski (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Christopher Morrow (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Justin M. Streiner (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Eric Tykwinski (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Joseph Jackson (Oct 03)
- RE: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? William F. Maton Sotomayor (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring? Andrew Gallo (Oct 03)