nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:47:36 +0100
On 7 Oct 2012, at 18:17, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
Intentionally crashing the moon into the earth is a new idea. How far should we run with it before concluding that it not only isn't a very good one, considering it hasn't taught us anything we didn't already know?
http://www.xent.com/FoRK-archive/july98/0041.html Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Steven Noble (Oct 07)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Paul Vinciguerra (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jay Ashworth (Oct 07)
- Re: names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design John Levine (Oct 06)
- Re: names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design Joe Hamelin (Oct 06)
- Re: names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Tony Finch (Oct 08)