Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

[joseph.snyder () gmail com]

Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

> On Oct 7, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2012 1:48 PM, "Tom Limoncelli" <tal () whatexit org> wrote:
> > > Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical
> > > internet user?   I'd also be interested in anecdotes.
> >
> > Anecdote. Sub-millasecond, with full load. (gigs and gigs) . CGN does
> not
> > meaningfully add latency. CGN is not enough of a factor to impact
> happy
> > eyeballs in a way that improves ipv6 use.
> >
> > > I've seen theoretical predictions but by now we should have
> > > measurements from early-world deployments.
> >
> > Most mobile providers have been doing what is commonly called cgn for
> 5 to
> > 10 years. CGN is not a new concept or implementation for mobile.
>
> True, but, as we have discussed before, mobile users, especially in the
> US,
> have dramatically lowered expectations of internet access from their
> mobile
> devices vs. what they expect from a household ISP.
>
> We expect half the services we want to be crippled by mobile carriers
> because
> they don't like competition. We file lawsuits when that happens on our
> terrestrial connections.
>
> Owen

Except now you have to do mediation, since class action lawsuits are now null and void. :)
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.