nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld () nsrc org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:48:56 +0100
joel jaeggli (joelja) writes:
On 11/24/12 8:29 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:On Nov 25, 2012, at 10:09 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:from goeff huston's data they have more v6 at home.And not purposely, either - because it's enabled by default on recent client OSes. My guess is that a non-trivial fraction of observed IPv6 traffic today is unintentional.In their defense, they don't know they have ipv4 connectivity either.
They don't know it's not real IPv4 either :) But yeah, if Joe Random enables 6to4 on his Airport Express without understanding what it means, it still translates to more IPv6 traffic during evenings and weekend from residential connections. It's be interesting to come up with a metric to compare "inadvertently" vs "on purpose" v6 traffic. Free.fr, for instance, enables v6 by default on their 6th gen freebox (set top box). Is that inadvertent ? For whom ? Phil
Current thread:
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration, (continued)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration TJ (Nov 20)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Blair Trosper (Nov 20)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Tomas Podermanski (Nov 20)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Michael Kratz (Nov 21)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Jay (Nov 21)
- RE: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Frank Bulk (Nov 21)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Jonathan Towne (Nov 21)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration TJ (Nov 20)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dobbins, Roland (Nov 24)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration joel jaeggli (Nov 24)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Phil Regnauld (Nov 25)