nanog mailing list archives

RE: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration


From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:54:34 -0600

We have cable broadband operations using vendor M and we're a little gun-shy because that vendor has lagged the other 
two with IPv6 support, and when Comcast and TimeWarner began their production IPv6 rollouts on their CMTes it wasn't 
with vendor M.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay [mailto:tech-lists () packet-labs net] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 10:52 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

On 11/20/2012 1:24 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
However, I still scratch my head on why most major US ISPs *have* robust
IPv6 peering and infrastructure and are ready to go, but they have not
turned it on for their fiber/cable/DSL customers for reasons that are not
clear to me.

I keep pestering my home ISP about turning it on (since their network is
now 100% DOCSIS 3), but they just seem to think I'm making up words.  One
can hope, though.

This has partially been a vendor issue, at least for cable providers. 
Two of the major CMTS vendors (one starts with C, the other A) have had 
IPv6 related bugs in fairly recent code releases.    Both of the MSOs 
I've worked for have had to delay IPv6 deployment while those vendors 
get their waterfowl properly aligned.  I know we're still waiting for 
one vendor to get it straightened out.

J





Current thread: