nanog mailing list archives

Re: Google/Youtube problems


From: Joly MacFie <joly () punkcast com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:21 -0500

WIth my limited understanding of such topics I've long been confused by
something I read a couple of years back - in an Arbor report perhaps - to
the effect that by being the originator of so much traffic, and as they
built out their own network, Google were making money on transit.

Can anyone elaborate or refute?


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:

On 11/19/12 5:59 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:

What I'm trying to say, I can't see youtube generating anywhere nearly
enough revenue who shift 10% (or more) of Internet. And to explain this
conundrum to myself, I've speculated accounting magic (which I'd frown
upon) and leveraging market position to get free capacity (which is ok, I'd
do the same, had I the leverage)

Or there's a simpler explanation. Which is that it makes money either
directly or as part of a salubrious interaction with other google
properties.

They had about 2.5Billion left over for their trouble in the quarter
ending 9/30 which isn't too shabby on a gross of 14 billion.




-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-


Current thread: