Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Derek Ivey <derek () derekivey com> wrote:
> Verizon still seems to be quiet about their IPv6 plans for their FiOS
> network too :(.

no they aren't, their complete lack of any noise is their plan.

no plan.

joy.

> On 5/22/2012 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> > I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I
> > get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it.
> >
> > It certainly does not work on the iPad "3" in Ohio. Not only that, but I
> > can't even pay them to give me a stable IPv4 address, because if you get a
> > static IP, it disables the hotspot functionality. Head-->Wall.
> >
> > thanks,
> > -Randy
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
> > > <rcarpen () network1 net>  wrote:
> > > > Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they
> > > > also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that
> > > > changes your IP address every couple minutes. The only way to get
> > > > a stable connection is to pay them $500 to get a static public IP
> > > > address.
> > > wierd, I could swear someone in my office with a galaxy-nexus-on-vzw
> > > was able to browse some ipv6-only sites.