nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc)
From: Jeff Young <young () jsyoung net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:12:43 +1100
On 23/03/2012, at 4:51 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
As you might imagine, I am a fairly strong proponent of muni layer 1 -- or even layer 2, where the municipality supplies (matching) ONTs, and services have to fit over GigE -- fiber delivery of high-speed data service. I believe Google agrees with me. :-)
And the country of Australia agrees with you (at least more than half of it). The current nature of FTTH makes it hard to do a layer 1-only service and the NBN has opted to provide layer 2 hand-off at POI's (points of interconnect) around Australia. jy
Current thread:
- Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc (was: att fiber, et al) John Kreno (Mar 22)
- Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc (was: att fiber, et al) Keegan Holley (Mar 22)
- Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Jay Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Jeff Young (Mar 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Kris Price (Mar 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Jared Mauch (Mar 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Masataka Ohta (Mar 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) William Herrin (Mar 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Masataka Ohta (Mar 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) William Herrin (Mar 23)
- RE: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Frank Bulk (Mar 24)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc) Jay Ashworth (Mar 23)