nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:14:00 +0100
On 12 Mar 2012, at 21:15 , William Herrin wrote:
Not at all. You just build a second tier to the routing system.
It's so strange how people think a locator/identifier split will solve the scalability problem. We already have two tiers: DNS names and IP addresses. So that didn't solve anything. I don't see any reason a second second tier would.
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 18)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Tim Chown (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Łukasz Bromirski (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Geoff Huston (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Bicknell (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Josh Hoppes (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mark Andrews (Mar 12)