Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

[Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>]

On 12 Mar 2012, at 19:30, Owen DeLong wrote:

> I know my view is unpopular, but, I really would rather see PI made inexpensive and readily available than see NAT 
> brought into the IPv6 mainstream. However, in my experience, very few residential customers make use of that 3G 
> backup port.

So what assumptions do you think future IPv6-enabled homenets might make about the prefixes they receive or can use?   
Isn't having a PI per residential homenet rather unlikely?

It would be desirable to avoid NPTv6 in the homenet scenario.

Tim