nanog mailing list archives
RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 06:52:50 +0000
I'm well into my second decade of having a v6 prefix in the dfz and am passingly familiar with powers of two...
Point is that expecting people globally to take a /48 from PA space probably isn't a realistic expectation.
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sander Steffann (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Herbert (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jared Mauch (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)